Public Health Impacts of State Policies Mandating Point-of-Sale Warning Signs Regarding Cannabis Use During Pregnancy

University of California, San Francisco

Year: 2020

Amount: $1,038,782

Status: Completed

Primary Investigator: Roberts

Summary

This project examines whether state policies requiring point-of-sale warnings about cannabis use during pregnancy actually influence cannabis use, beliefs about safety, stigma, and attitudes toward pregnant people who use cannabis. The research finds little evidence that warning-sign policies reduce cannabis use during pregnancy and suggests they may instead contribute to stigma and support for punitive responses, raising questions about the effectiveness and unintended consequences of these public-health warnings.

Publications

Association of Mandatory Warning Signs for Cannabis Use During Pregnancy With Cannabis Use Beliefs and Behaviors

Is legal recreational cannabis associated with cannabis use during pregnancy, beliefs about safety, and perceived community stigma?

Mistrust Limits Possibilities for Patient-Provider Discussions Regarding Cannabis Use During Pregnancy

Pregnant and recently pregnant people’s views on policies that punish pregnant people who use cannabis

Reasons pregnant people use cannabis to self-treat health conditions during pregnancy: Results from a US population-based survey

Relationship between mandatory warning signs for cannabis use during pregnancy policies and birth outcomes in the Western United States